Wednesday, July 30, 2014

This is Great News(tm) ??????

GW's full year results out. And they are terrible....not just bad but I'm pretty sure Malcolm Tucker would view them as a F#$k$*g Bona-fide Omnishambles.
Here are the headline numbers (2014 v 2013):

Revenue: -9%
Operating Profit (pre exceptional items & royalties) -24%
Operating Profit -43%
Earnings per share: -51%

No dividend is going to be paid. And it looks like the new website cost $4.5 mio GBP.
Revenue down by 9% but Cost of Sales the same
Australian sales down 22%, Australian Operating Profit down 26% to GBP 557k
In the Strategic Report GW admit they do no demographic research as they control the niche??!!??

Tom Kirby is stepping down as CEO (acting) - though I'd suggest he failed that description but wants to stay as Chairman.
Scariest thing of all is the ramble included in his spiel:



CHAIRMAN’S PREAMBLE


Games Workshop has had a really good year.




If your measure of 'good' is the current financial year's numbers, you may not agree. But if your measure is the long-term survivability of a


great cash generating business that still has a lot of potential growth, then you will agree.



Having taken on the conversion of our stores to a one man format with all the concomitant complexity of staff changes and new sites and


new lease negotiations – a long job not quite finished – we decided to re-arrange the management of our sales channels from a countrybased


system to a central one. This meant removing four european headquarters, consolidating all trade (third party) sales personnel at


our Nottingham base, creating a new continental european grouping of our retail stores, and recruiting new management for these


divisions whilst flattening the structure by removing all middle management. At the same time we changed leadership of our retail chain in


the north american area, and gave birth to our new web store after many months’ labour.



All this has significantly de-risked the business. We have far fewer key personnel to replace if need be, and a much lower cost base


(£2 million p.a. less). It has cost, in total, around £4.5 million to accomplish. The new web store allows us to sell online more efficiently. It


cost around £4 million.



This augurs well for our long term health and cash flow.



What is really remarkable, however, is that it was all accomplished in five months. The levels of complexity handled by our 'back-office'


staff – personnel, IT and accounts – are beyond my descriptive abilities. And yet it was co-operatively done with precision, efficiency and


calmness at a ferocious speed.



We all owe these people a big vote of thanks. They have saved the company millions. Working with people like this is why it is a pleasure to work here.





In the technological world we occupy there is constant debate over who 'innovates' and who merely copies. We have, this last year, spent


an indecent amount of your money trying to stop someone stealing our ideas and images. It is a very difficult thing to do when it is done


through a legal system designed to prevent people stealing hogs from one another. Our experience has probably been typical of most – far


too much money spent on far too little gain. The argument is that we have to do this or we will, bit by bit, lose everything that we hold


dear, everything that keeps the business going. Our crops will wither, our children will die piteous deaths and the sun will be swept from


the sky. But is it true?



Last year I published the secret that I believe is at the heart of what makes this business great. Steve Jobs once did the same over at heavily


litigating Apple. He said they ignored everything that did not lead to 'insanely great products' and that was what made them great. None of


the people Apple are suing are trying to do that, so why sue?



I said, ‘we recruit for attitude and not for skill’. It is what makes us great. It is those people who design the miniatures; those people who


make them and those people who sell them; those people who transformed our business systems in five short months. I have been


deluged with two comments about that statement, neither of which was: 'you fool, you just gave away the crown jewels'. Why doesn't


everyone do it? Ask them.




Because no one seems able to grasp the essential simplicity of what we do there has always been the search for the Achilles heel, the one


thing that Kirby and his cronies have overlooked. These are legion. I run through the list from time to time when someone says that


computer games will be the death of us – they are so much more realistic now! – again. This year it is 3-D printing. Pretty soon everyone


will be printing their own miniatures and where will we be then, eh?



We know quite a lot about 3-D printers, having been at the forefront of the technology for many years. We know of what we speak. One


day 3-D printers will be affordable (agreed), they are now, they will be able to produce fantastic detail (the affordable ones won't) and they


will do it faster than one miniature per day (no, they won't, look it up). So we may get to the time when someone can make a poorly


detailed miniature at home and have enough for an army in less than a year. That pre-supposes that 3-D scanning technology will be


affordable and good enough (don't bet the mortgage on that one) and that everyone will be happy to have nothing but copies of old


miniatures.



All of our great new miniatures come from Citadel. It is possible that one day we will sell them direct via 3-D printers to grateful hobbyists

around the world. That will not happen in the next few years (or, in City-speak, 'forever') but if and when it does it will just mean that we

can cut yet more cost out of the supply chain and be making good margins selling Citadel 3-D printers.



At the heart of the delusion is the notion that designing and making miniatures is easy. It isn't.

On the first of January next year I will be stepping down as CEO of Games Workshop. I intend staying on as non-executive Chairman (if the



board will have me), so those of you who want to see an end to these preambles (rhymes with rambles), don't get your hopes up just yet.



The board has prepared a job specification for CEO, and the consequential advertisement. The ad. will be published the day after our AGM


(September 18th). If you apply, we require that you write a letter saying why you want the job. No letter, no interview. The interviews will


take place on November 7th and will be at Nottingham. An announcement will be made the following week. We have not decided what will


happen if no suitable candidate is found but I suspect my wife will be livid.



Let me dilate about this letter. Last year I wrote here about our recruitment process, and shortly afterwards we recruited a new nonexecutive


director (NXD) using the method described. We got a great (not good, great) new board member. She is still surprised that I did


not read her CV (exasperated would be a more accurate word) but there was no need. Her letter told us what kind of person she was:


sincere, open-minded, a learner, excited at the opportunity. The interview told us she had all the qualities needed. It mattered not one jot

what her CV said. Appointing NXDs because of their careers rather than who they are is at the heart of the rot in the corporate world.






Tom Kirby

Chairman and acting CEO


28 July 2014

6 comments:

  1. "Games Workshop has had a really good year."
    Repeat a lie often enough and it becomes truth....

    Fancy writing a letter of application Pete?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Guess I am not the only one who has completely stopped spending on GW product...

    ReplyDelete
  3. I'd be curious to see another companies sales figures by comparison (i.e. Battlefront). GW have failed to embrace globalisation of the marketplace (indicative by their regional sales restrictions) in a rather big way.

    His comments in regards to Apple are amusing... given how Apple make such a song and dance about IP... and where their market share has ended up as a result...

    ReplyDelete
  4. I can't remember reading such unprofessional reports from a Chair and a CEO in an Annual Report.
    It is poorly written and not in the least convincing. I think he has got lost in the fantasy world created.
    A bit worrying really.

    ReplyDelete